07 Feb 2024




Intermediate

Hashtable and Dictionary<K, V> are both collection classes in C#, but they have several differences in terms of usage, performance, and features. Here are the key differences between them:

  1. Type Safety:

    • Hashtable: It is not type-safe because it stores objects as keys and values. You need to cast the values retrieved from a Hashtable to their appropriate types.
    • Dictionary<K, V>: It is type-safe. You specify the types of keys (K) and values (V) that the dictionary can contain, and it enforces type safety at compile time.
  2. Null Keys and Values:

    • Hashtable: Allows both null keys and null values.
    • Dictionary<K, V>: Does not allow null keys. However, it allows null values if the value type (V) is nullable (Nullable<V> or V?).
  3. Performance:

    • Hashtable: Slightly less efficient than Dictionary<K, V> due to boxing and unboxing operations required for value types, and it performs slightly worse with value types compared to Dictionary<K, V>.
    • Dictionary<K, V>: Optimized for performance and provides better performance compared to Hashtable, especially with value types.
  4. Usage:

    • Hashtable: Considered a legacy collection. While it can still be used, Dictionary<K, V> is the preferred choice for new development due to its type safety and better performance.
    • Dictionary<K, V>: Preferred choice for key-value pair storage in modern C# development due to its type safety, better performance, and LINQ integration.
  5. Thread Safety:

    • Neither Hashtable nor Dictionary<K, V> provides inherent thread safety. If thread safety is required, you must synchronize access to the collection manually using techniques such as locking or by using thread-safe collections like ConcurrentDictionary<K, V>.
  6. Syntax:

    • Hashtable: Uses the Add method to add key-value pairs.
    • Dictionary<K, V>: Uses indexer syntax (dictionary[key] = value) or the Add method to add key-value pairs.
FeatureHashtableDictionary<K, V>
Type SafetyNot type-safe; stores objects as keys and valuesType-safe; enforces type safety at compile time
Null Keys and ValuesAllows both null keys and null valuesDoes not allow null keys; allows null values if the value type is nullable
PerformanceSlightly less efficient due to boxing and unboxing operations for value typesOptimized for performance; better performance compared to Hashtable, especially with value types
UsageConsidered a legacy collection; used less frequently in modern C# developmentPreferred choice for key-value pair storage in modern C# development
Thread SafetyNot inherently thread-safe; requires manual synchronization if thread safety is requiredNot inherently thread-safe; requires manual synchronization if thread safety is required
SyntaxUses the Add method to add key-value pairsUses indexer syntax (dictionary[key] = value) or the Add method to add key-value pairs

In summary, Dictionary<K, V> is the preferred choice for key-value pair storage in modern C# development due to its type safety, better performance, and LINQ integration. Hashtable is considered a legacy collection and is used less frequently in new development scenarios.

c-sharp
hashtable
dictionary